Last updated: 25 August 2026
GluJob aims to publish useful and accurate vacancy information. Employers can change roles, locations, requirements or deadlines without notifying us, so corrections and freshness checks are part of the editorial process.
How vacancy information is verified
Before publication, we aim to identify the employer, locate an official or otherwise credible source, check the application destination and compare material details such as role title, location and eligibility. For a multi-vacancy article, readers must still verify each individual role on the employer’s official portal.
Report an error
Email enq@glujob.com with:
- the GluJob article URL;
- the employer and vacancy concerned;
- the exact statement or link that needs review;
- why it appears incorrect, expired or unsafe; and
- an official source link or supporting screenshot, if available.
Do not send a CV, passport, certificate, OTP or banking information.
What happens after a report
We compare the report against available primary sources. Depending on the result, we may correct the text or link, add context, mark a vacancy as expired, remove unsafe information or leave the article unchanged when the claim cannot be substantiated.
Material and minor corrections
A correction that changes a reader’s understanding—such as the employer, role, location, eligibility, deadline, application destination or safety status—is treated as material and should update the article’s modified date. Spelling, formatting and grammar changes that do not alter meaning may be corrected without a separate notice.
Expired vacancies
An expired vacancy may remain available for reference if it is clearly outdated and does not mislead readers into believing applications remain open. Where practical, the article may point to the employer’s current careers page.
Source conflicts
If GluJob’s summary conflicts with the employer’s current official page, the employer page takes priority. A third-party message claiming to represent an employer is not treated as authoritative without reasonable verification.
Abuse and bad-faith requests
We may decline requests that are abusive, fraudulent, unrelated or intended to remove accurate public-interest information without a valid basis. Copyright, privacy and legal requests receive separate review where appropriate.